"Undermining my electoral viability since 2001."

Mass Power, Personal Publishing, Etc

Well, in spite of my skepticism, BarCamp got my juices flowing.

Mass Power

See, the internet is only getting more popular, and no one out there is really doing shit (or going to do shit) with it in the 2006 cycle. It's all lessons learned from three years ago, finally penitrating the establishment. That's nice because there's money to be made. That's also nice because it means there's opportunity in all that unclaimed territory.

Just look at this, this and this and let's do some quick math.

  • 27.8 Million Americans between the age of 18 and 24 voted in 2004
  • About 17 Million of them voted for Kerry
  • Basically all these kids (90%+) are online
  • The population wave on its way through is going to peak on voting age in 2008

No one is really doing anything to capture these people. What would it take to build a mass-membership organization with 1.5 million members between the age of 16 and 26? An organization that could get a minumum of $10 from all its members?

Personal Publishing

Well, it's high time I made the move with my own publishing enterprise. This old URL is getting an overhaul. Here's the plan:

  1. Outlandishjosh.com -- New Front Page which aggregates the latest and greatest from all of my endeavors below; internally maintains my own wiki (which is what the broken sub-sections of this site really want to be).
  2. Outlandishjosh.com/blog -- personal publishing and gonzo journalism.
  3. Trellon.org -- Professional blogging for the nerds; open source technology, the internet, campaigns and organizations. The new art and science of participation.
  4. As-Yet-Unnamed Online Venture -- New center for professional writing on the subject of politics. Not blogging (although a blog may be employed) so much as content creation aimed at Book-type ends.
  5. I Preach A Dark Future -- Working title for an artistic endeavor to create audio drama for distribution over the internets.

I think all that can be set up in the next few weeks. Especially if I get the internets in my home.

Read More

Read More

Tags: 

China's tyranny has the best hi-tech help

Censoring the Internet: the International Herald Tribune runs an Op Ed about the number of American High Tech companies who are helping. This is not only troubling because, hey, it's kind of wrong to make the internet into an arm of the police state -- even if you're doing it in China -- but also because it begs some rather troubling questions:

[S]hould we care what Chinese are reading on the Internet? John Palfrey of Harvard is blunt: "The ramifications of this censorship regime should be of concern to anyone who believes in participatory democracy. How the Chinese government restricts its citizens' online interactions is significantly altering the global Internet landscape."

Americans who think that in any event China is far away may be jolted by this suggestion from Rebecca MacKinnon, a former foreign correspondent in China now specializing in Internet censorship: "If these American technology companies have so few moral qualms about giving in to Chinese government demands to hand over Chinese user data or censor Chinese people's content, can we be sure they won't do the same thing in response to potentially illegal demands by an over-zealous government agency in our own country? Or will we all sit there like frogs in water being brought very slowly to a boil?"

This is a theme that's only going to become more prominant. It's a moral issue.

Read More

Tags: 

China's tyranny has the best hi-tech help

Censoring the Internet: the International Herald Tribune runs an Op Ed about the number of American High Tech companies who are helping. This is not only troubling because, hey, it's kind of wrong to make the internet into an arm of the police state -- even if you're doing it in China -- but also because it begs some rather troubling questions:

[S]hould we care what Chinese are reading on the Internet? John Palfrey of Harvard is blunt: "The ramifications of this censorship regime should be of concern to anyone who believes in participatory democracy. How the Chinese government restricts its citizens' online interactions is significantly altering the global Internet landscape."

Americans who think that in any event China is far away may be jolted by this suggestion from Rebecca MacKinnon, a former foreign correspondent in China now specializing in Internet censorship: "If these American technology companies have so few moral qualms about giving in to Chinese government demands to hand over Chinese user data or censor Chinese people's content, can we be sure they won't do the same thing in response to potentially illegal demands by an over-zealous government agency in our own country? Or will we all sit there like frogs in water being brought very slowly to a boil?"

This is a theme that's only going to become more prominant. It's a moral issue.

Read More

Tags: