"Undermining my electoral viability since 2001."

Myths and JC

Talking Narnia to Your Neighbors

I wasn't aware until someone (think it was Julia) told me that the Narnia books were somehow Christian. I loved 'em as a kid, just like I loved the Redwall books (which in hindsight probably also have a nominally "Christian" message) and the works of Tolken (who actually converted C.S. Lewis, so there you go). It seems to me that all these are moral and spiritual allegories -- no doubt written by Christian people who wanted in some part to share their vision of the universe in a fictionalized context -- which have broadly applicable lessons about responsibility, honesty, courage, friendship, etc. In short, they're good mytic tales.

It's interesting though because some people sort of seem to shy away from that once they learn they might have a Christian subtext. In understand people don't want to be preached at, especially subliminally, but it's not as though Harry Potter is going to make you into a Wiccan, and it's not as though watching a frickin' movie about a talking Lion is going to convert anyone.

On the other hand, the investment money behind the film reportely may have a missionary edge, so there's that to consider. Seems to me though that people on the right may have taken their own dire, and in my thinking innacurate, predictions about "the power of the culture" to control people's minds to heart, and are trying to fight fire with fire, so to speak.

I dunno; it seems strange and sort of unfortunate how touchy people are about faith, how hard it is to actually talk about. My experience of being brought up agnistically is pretty un-ordinary, so maybe I'm missing out on the power that religion can have when you're raised within its context. Maybe its easy for me to take my own value from these stories because they can't hook or touch me in certain ways.

Religion is a strange thing. I don't practice in an organized fashion, but I have my own set of beliefs and ways of making peace with the unknown, with telling right from wrong. But I've lived a very lucky life; not much tragidy or hardship to tell about. I'm priviledged in a whole lot of ways.

Yeah, anyway, I don't know what the point is here, but I'm curious what other people might think.

Read More

Tags: 

Comments Blowin Up! What's The Future Hold...

Hey y'all.

So I'm pleased and gratified by the increased commentary of late. I'm all about community and shit.

Something I've been threatening to do for ages is convert this old website to Drupal. It's a system I'm professionaly conversant with (so I can hack it to high heck), and it's got much nicer features for users/visitors, starting with threaded conversations.

I'm going to be staying in NYC for the holidays with a little free time on my hands, and I think I might take the plunge there. I'm trying to think how I can do this and offer y'all something more out of it too...

Suppose I were to set that up, and put it under a more generic name (not outlandishjosh.com, which would remain a part of it, but not be the main thing) and let people set up their own blogs and so forth. Like, way cooler than blogger. Would that be interesting to anyone?

Read More

Iraq and Vietnam

It took me a while (being born in 1979 and all) to realize that a lot of the debate over Iraq is/was really about re-fighting the politcal battle over Vietnam.

What's surprising is how much the government's strategy also maps to what was said in the 60s about the conflict there. The paralells are really kind of scary.

Read More

Tags: 

Jujutsu

Tomorrow, the GOP will launch attack ads saying Democrats are waving the white flag in Iraq by saying a military victory there is not possible for US forces.

There's some debate about how to respond, a lot of noise out there, but I think this dairist on Kos has it right.

The idea here is not to get Bush. Bush isn't up for re-election. Don't use Republican statements (Hagel, et al) to try and create a bipartisan cover for anti-war Dems. We don't need it. This is about contrast, people. We've got the public consensus on Iraq. The occupation is not suddenly going to get popular because of an ad campaign. Americans aren't going to change their minds and decide they like the war, but they may change their mind about who they want to lead them out of it.

Democrats need to provide a compelling rationale as to why they, not the GOP, should have the job of ending the US occupation.

The message is simple. Republicans (not Bush, Republicans... make them point out the difference; it confuses them to be divided against their leader) are fixated on an impossible military victory in Iraq. They are profiteering off this war, and they lack the will, courage, and insight to understand how to best Al-Qaeda. Then play the Bush speech about how he doesn't think we'll win the war on terror. Republicans, obsessed with Iraq, soft on terrorists.

Democrats understand that real victory in Iraq is up to the Iraqis, and that US troops there are providing a strategic benefit to our real enemies in Al-Qaeda. We want to stop spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year to fund what has become a giant terrorist training camp. We want to stop putting our troops in harms way guarding an occupation based on lies and misinformation. We want to bring our occupation of Iraq to a close so we can get back to Job #1: shutting down international terrorist networks.

Read More

Tags: