"Undermining my electoral viability since 2001."

Sleep In My Bed (sans me)

I'm fleeing Brooklyn for the summer, and the little corner of Park Slope that I just painted yellow and call "home" is up for grabs. It's 2 blocks from the 7th Ave F train, 1 block from Prospect park, and it's already got everything you need to live: a bed, some bookshelves, and little nightstand and lights and stuff.

Really, it's quite nice. If you know anyone who's sane and looking for a furnished summer sublect (available June 1st - September, or some subsection thereof), in the $750 price range, let me know. It would be good to "keep it in the family," in case I want to come back.

On the other hand, if you just want to move in and take over my shit, you could probably do that too. Posessions are fleeting.

Read More

Tags: 

President Above Law

Bush believes he is above the law, and has been acting that way for a while. I'm sort of contemptuous of the law myself, but then again I'm not the President.

Glenn Greenwald provides some context. It's a problem. I'm less certain that anyone cares though. It fits in with the larger crisis of confidence.

Colbert dropped some bombs at the press corps dinner last night. Apparently his jokes didn't go over as well as back in '04 when Bush slayed 'em with his "Where's the WMD" routine.

Read More

Tags: 

Dance Party

At a loft part last night, down underneath the F-line by Gowanus Canal. Music scene. Observations were about how social norms regarding smoking have changed along with the law: cigarettes out in the hallway only. The musicians were talented; very Stereolab-esque, but there wasn't ever critical mass for the dance party it should have been.

I like a good dance party, gotta say. Big steppin'.

Read More

Tags: 

Let's go Tripping in Mexico

Mexico legalizes small-time possession.

This is part of a growing global consensus that the US's idea of a "War on Drugs" (much like the US's idea of "how to run your economy") doesn't really work. This follows the Bolivian embrace of cocoa production, and a general disaffection with governing models from Washington DC throughout the hemisphere.

And they're right. The particular social problems created by drugs are not best addressed through police action.

Prohibition has very limited utility. It actually serves to exacerbate real problems by creating a lucrative criminal economy, preventing education that can reduce risk/harm, and driving addicts further underground, away from the help they need.

People's desire to tinker with their own biochemistry is enduring and exists in all known human cultures. Lord knows I've done my share, and I don't think there's anything criminal about that. I tend to think this is something people should generally have a right to do.

Anyway, if anti-drug crusaders were really concerned with how the stuff we put into our body is impacting our health and well-being (as individuals or as a society), they'd be talking about the obeisety epidemic and our fundimentally fucked up attitudes toward food and nutrition. However, our drug war is actually about enforcing a certain set of cultural norms, which is why it doesn't work.

Read More

Tags: 

Paranoia Is Egocentric

Apparently number of right-wing bloggers -- all on the same hosting provider -- are "under seige" from "Islamofacist hackers." Michelle Malkin is gallantly organizing the defense.

Here's a secret. Michelle, Ed, gang: $10 a month mass-hosting sites often experience outages. When your business model is based on over-subscribing your infrastructure, it doesn't take much to foul you up. If you want rock-solid hosting, you have to pay for it, or throw your lot in with a large-scale ASP host (and accept the reduced range of options that result).

For anyone in the biz, it's kind of funny to see how these support threads (one, two) turn into "We're under attack from crazies in Saudi Arabia."

It may or may not be true that this is a pissing match over some postings. But this is huge news for these people, and it's kind of pathetic.

Meanwhile, in Darfur...

Read More

Paranoia Is Egocentric

Apparently number of right-wing bloggers -- all on the same hosting provider -- are "under seige" from "Islamofacist hackers." Michelle Malkin is gallantly organizing the defense.

Here's a secret. Michelle, Ed, gang: $10 a month mass-hosting sites often experience outages. When your business model is based on over-subscribing your infrastructure, it doesn't take much to foul you up. If you want rock-solid hosting, you have to pay for it, or throw your lot in with a large-scale ASP host (and accept the reduced range of options that result).

For anyone in the biz, it's kind of funny to see how these support threads (one, two) turn into "We're under attack from crazies in Saudi Arabia."

It may or may not be true that this is a pissing match over some postings. But this is huge news for these people, and it's kind of pathetic.

Meanwhile, in Darfur...

Read More

Neil Young

Listen to the new Neil Young Album, Living With War.

It's an interesting concept. They have a flash-player that'll let you play the tracks in order. No fast-forward. Old school.

Whoever marketed this stuff must have hired one of those online firms (or had some savvy staffers). Neil's on myspace and blogger. It's thin on the usual kind of content for those places (no doubt because Mr. Young has better things to do than blog), but the outreach is worthy.

So far, first two tracks are good. Try it out!

UPDATE: Listened to the whole thing. It's all good! It's got a lot of the same dirty guitar and chorus type stuff as Greendale, but the songs are regular-length and mostly about war.

Read More

Tags: 

Off the Top of the Mind

Fact: there are 250,000 friends of Laphroaig, which is my favorite scotch (and pronounced "la-frayg"). That's a good benchmark for building a list, eh?

I'm thinkin' more and more about the kind of life I want to build. It's clear that I have marketable skills, but how best to configure them? How best to allocate my energy? I have the enormous privilege at this point not to worry particularly about I will survive, the luxury of first-world problems. I also have a pretty good social network for professional/career purposes. People tend to like me (because, hey, I'm likable), and I have enough of a sense for folks that I think I do a good job of hanging on to the good connections. I'm also enencumbered by any serious legal, financial, or personal constraints. I could literally go anywhere to do anything, as long as I really thought it was worth it.

I'm blessed in many ways, yes, we all know. But what's the boy making of the whole thing? What's he got going?

Well, that's a bit more unclear. I'm involved in the Drupal snowball, which is growing pretty rapidly and career-wise seems to be a good place to be for the forseeable future. It's in a good position to get more popular and even more in demand as the number of people online continues to grow, so long-run that's cool.

However, my position there is ticklish. I've yet to attempt my own initiative, and this begs the question.

It occurs to me that this Drupal Camp thing might be an interesting evolution of what I've been doing. I certainly enjoyed the camp in SF. I think Jeff (who points us to google earth for mac) did a fantastic job running the show there, and I'm excited to collaborate with Aaron and try our own version come May. It makes me wonder if I couldn't parlay the whole training bit into the baseline for a new kind of life/work configuration.

I spend a good portion of my energy now working with people in various capacities which could be construed as "training." With Trellon, I work with the other developers as well as clients in a number of ways that span direct training/education to collaborative investigation/prolem-solving. This is the part of the job I enjoy the most.

I also to do a fair amount of management, sales-support, client-relations and interpersonal maneuvering. This is work I'm somewhat less enthused about pursuing professionally, largely because a lot of it is bullshit.

That's not to say that the art of interpersonal communication isn't an important part of any pursuit (it is), or that all the conference-calls I take part in are pointless (they aren't). Just to say that I feel like in a lot of cases it could be better, and specifically some of the time I feel that I could do better, and that I don't want to professionally specialize in this kind of thing, in being good in a meeting. I think the important stuff happens outside of meetings.

Indeed, I'm enthusiastic about the business end of things. I think making the market work for you is fucking important, and a worthy pursuit. That side plays in as well as my techical skills and desires when thinking about how I want to handle the qustion of work.

Finally, I have my creative nature to satisfy. If I'm passionate about a project this can really kick in and get going, but that kind of connection tends to happen less often when projects are encountered via a full-time-job. And when one has a full-time-job, it's difficult to reserve significant extracarricular energies to take on meaningful (e.g. passion-worthy) projects. It isn't exactly an original complaint, but it's true.

On the creative side, there are prospects for another serious run at a writing project, maybe starting this summer. At the very least, there's the self-imposed goal of new web-publishing and media experiments, part of the notion of a reconfigured daily schedule for the season. These are things I look forward to, things I intend to honor.

I also look forward to scrambling my social life a little bit. While I have no real complaints here, I do feel a little stagnant. It's my own damn fault, but I've become a little bit of a homebody since returning to Brooklyn. Partly this was by design, but partly it's my own lack of initiative and drive. I don't really expect this Summer to be a social rollercoaster (I'll be living out in the hills for pete's sake), but I am welcoming the shakeup in routines and in immediate company.

One of the big unanswered questions for me when contemplating life/career/etc is that of community. One of the things that's become clear to me is that I thive within and long for a strong community. I like living with my social network. I like feeling connected.

This is one of the reasons I default to New York as a home. My social network is still stronger here than anywhere else, but even beyond that there's the sense of connection here. It's not as strong as it used to be, but there's still that general urban sense of shared humanity. There's also a vibe to a lot of this city, and to a lot of the people who migrate here (it's a country within a country, you know), that I dig.

Hell, New York City is the only place where I seem to understand women. That's got to count for something. But still, I'm thinking more and more about alternatives.

We all know I'm not going to be a rambler forever. Figuring out where and how I want to settle down is a natural thing to do. It seems to me that trying to guide the crazy metior that is my life isn't all that bad a thing to think about. It's important (at least to me) to be conscious on this level.

Read More

Tags: 

Iran, Gold and the Big D

John Robb thinks it's on with Iran. His commenters run through the fallout, and one mentions that gold is at a 25-year high.

It just reminded me that if this goes down -- and I'm less certain that it will -- that this would provide the kind of economic shock that would bring on the Big D. If the cost of oil were to go up by 100% (which happened in '79) that's the kind of thing that could shake loose all sorts of secondary effects. The impact would be global.

Well, it wouldn't be the end of the world. I don't dig the doomsayers. A big slowdown might not be the worst thing for us, you know?

Read More

Tags: 

Net Neutrality Goes Down In House Committee

The Markey Amendment (which would affirm the principle of Network Neutrality in new Telco Regulations) was defeated in a House committee today, but the vote was much closer than it was previously. Stoller explains:

Ok, so the vote on the Markey amendment to protect the internet has happened, and it was voted down, 34-22. That is a big deal. It's too bad we lost the vote, but we expected that loss. What we did not expected was the narrow margin. By way of comparison, the subcommittee vote was 23-8, which means we should have gotten blown out of the water. We did not. All four targeted Dems by McJoan on Daily Kos flipped to our side, and many of the Congressmen both for and against this campaign mentioned the blogs and angry constituents.

There's a white hot firestorm on the issue on Capitol Hill. No one wants to see the telcos make a radical change to the internet and screw this medium up, except, well, the telcos. And now members of Congress are listening to us. The telcos have spent hundreds of millions of dollars and many years lobbying for their position; we launched four days ago, and have closed a lot of ground. Over the next few months, as the public wakes up, we'll close the rest of it.

I watched the markup and the voting, and there was noticeable defensiveness among Congressmen on the wrong side of this. They are wrong, they know it, and they are ashamed. Now they know people are watching. So we didn't win this vote, but this close margin was nonetheless a smack to the jaw of the insiders, and a clear victory for the people. Now the battle moves out of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and onto more favorable terrain.

The action now will be in the Senate, which is indeed more friendly terrain for our interests here. Let's keep the pressure on.

Read More

Pages